Technology

Standard methods, engineered for continuous use

SKAB does not introduce a new theory of dynamic identification. It applies established Operational Modal Analysis techniques automatically, continuously and at a sustainable cost. The innovation lies in the chain — acquisition, synchronisation, noise rejection, processing and comparison over time — not in the mathematics.

Architecture

Four layers, from sensor to interface

EDGE

SKAB stations

Continuous field acquisition, event detection, local buffering on non-volatile storage and managed upload. Firmware updatable remotely.

BROKER

IoT layer

Device management, telemetry, shared attributes, routing rules and over-the-air firmware distribution.

CLOUD

Ingest and processing

Integrity verification, decoding of the proprietary binary format, conversion to columnar storage, modal analysis pipeline and structured archiving.

FRONT

Interface

Web application with map, building catalogue, time series, analysis reports and alert management. Real-time updates.

Hardware

The station

Each station integrates complementary sensing: accelerometers designed for the very low noise levels of ambient vibration, a wideband channel for impulsive events, and a seismometer providing an immediate severity estimate.

ComponentRoleNotes
Low-noise MEMS accelerometerPrimary modal analysis channelTwo horizontal axes, 16-bit, ≈15 µg/√Hz noise density, selectable full scale.
Wideband accelerometerImpulsive and high-frequency eventsThree axes, extended bandwidth. Complementary to the OMA channel.
Dedicated seismometerSpectral Intensity (SI) and PGAHousner Spectral Intensity is the integral of the pseudo-velocity response spectrum over the period band relevant to buildings, expressed in kine (cm/s). It correlates with damage potential better than peak acceleration alone. Computed on board, available once the event has ended.
Environmental sensingNormalisation of comparisonsTemperature and humidity affect natural frequencies; they are logged so comparison happens under homogeneous conditions.
Dual-core MCUSeparate acquisition and connectivityOne core dedicated to real-time acquisition, the other to networking and storage.
4G / Wi-Fi connectivityData transmission and remote managementDeployment is possible even where no local network is available.

How many stations are needed. There is no single answer, and one should be wary of anyone who gives one. On a regular, box-like building, two or three stations are enough to describe global behaviour.

The torsional mode requires a specific condition. Identifying the rotation of the floor diaphragm about the vertical axis requires at least three stations placed on the same level and spaced apart in plan. A configuration with one station at the base and one at the top measures amplification along the height well, but cannot resolve the torsional mode: in that case f₁T remains undetermined. It is a geometric limitation, not an instrumental one, and must be considered when designing the layout.

On irregular geometries — L-shaped or U-shaped plans, adjoining blocks, structural joints — that configuration is not sufficient: different parts of the structure may respond independently. For these cases we are developing a dedicated approach based on recognising the modal pattern of the structure, which drives the number and position of measurement points from the actual geometry. Placement remains defined case by case, with reference to ISO 4866.

Processing pipeline

From raw sample to natural frequency

A

STA/LTA detection

Ratio between short- and long-term average of signal energy, computed on the horizontal component. An event is confirmed only if the ratio exceeds the threshold for a minimum duration and the dynamic peak is significant.

B

Noise classification

Known recurring sources within the building are recognised and separated from genuine transients, reducing analysis load and false positives.

C

Multi-station alignment

Acquisitions from different stations are brought onto a common time base. The required precision is high: even a modest misalignment degrades the identification of torsional modes. SKAB combines proprietary on-station synchronisation with residual correction during processing.

D

Spectral estimation and identification

Welch PSD, Frequency Domain Decomposition for mode detection, EFDD for damping estimation, SSI-COV in the time domain with stabilisation diagram.

E

Quality control

Magnitude-squared coherence between sensor pairs per frequency: values close to unity indicate points vibrating coherently, therefore a genuine structural mode rather than uncorrelated noise.

F

Baseline comparison and alerting

Computation of the relative shift against the reference and notification when agreed thresholds are exceeded.

Multi-panel operational modal analysis report
Multi-panel report: time series, spectrum, modal decomposition, stabilisation and mode shapes.
SSI-COV stabilisation diagram
If poles converge as model order increases, the mode is physical rather than a numerical artefact.
ParameterValueRationale
Sampling rate200 HzNyquist at 100 Hz, wide margin over the band of interest.
Analysis band0.1 – 10 HzTypical range of building natural modes.
Analysis windows30 – 60 sTrade-off between frequency resolution and stationarity.
Session duration1 – 120 minRemotely configurable per station.
References

Standards and literature

SKAB does not define its own criteria: it sits within an existing normative and scientific framework.

Standards

  • EN 1998-1 (Eurocode 8, Part 1) — vibration modes and modal response spectrum analysis.
  • EN 1998-3 (Eurocode 8, Part 3) — assessment of existing structures and damage state identification from experimental measurements.
  • ISO 4866:2010 — measurement of vibration on fixed structures: terminology, procedures, sensor placement.
  • ISO 13822:2010 — assessment of existing structures using monitoring-based methods.
  • NTC 2018 and Circolare 7/2019 (Italian building code) — modal analysis, participating mass, expected natural frequencies by structural typology.

SHM and OMA literature

  • Rytter (1993) — the four levels of damage identification: presence, location, severity, remaining life. SKAB currently operates at the first two.
  • SAMCO Guidelines (2006) — European guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring.
  • Brincker & Ventura (2015), Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis — primary reference for FDD, EFDD and SSI.
  • Peeters & De Roeck (1999) — Stochastic Subspace Identification.
  • Housner (1952) — definition of Spectral Intensity; FEMA 306/307/308 and ASCE 41-17 for damage classification and use of vibration measurements.

Methodological honesty. The most widely cited reference ranges derive predominantly from reinforced concrete buildings in Japan and the United States. The Italian building stock is largely historic masonry and pre-seismic-code construction: direct transferability of those thresholds is not demonstrated. Operating thresholds on a real building are therefore always defined together with the appointed structural engineer, and never applied automatically by the system.

Want to see the platform on real data?

We can arrange a technical demo using analysis reports produced by stations currently in service.